In-Situ Imaging of Crack Growth with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors
AIAA Journal, Vol: 45, Issue: 11, Page: 2758-2769
2007
- 1Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
Article Description
Piezoelectric-wafer active sensors are small, inexpensive, noninvasive, elastic wave transmitters/receivers that can be easily affixed to a structure. As wide-band nonresonant devices, piezoelectric-wafer active sensors can selectively tune in various Lamb-wave modes traveling in a thin-wall structure. This paper presents results obtained using a linear piezoelectric-wafer phased array to in situ image crack growth during a simulated structural health monitoring test on a large 2024-T3 aluminum plate. During the test, in situ readings of the piezoelectric-wafer phased array were taken in a round-robin fashion while the testing machine was running. Additional hardware was incorporated to prefilter the received signals before digitization to obtain usable readings. The received signals were postprocessed with the embedded ultrasonic structural radar phased-array algorithm and a direct imaging of the crack in the test plate was obtained. The imaging results were compared with physical measurements of the crack size using a digital camera. Good consistency was observed. The results of this investigation could be used to predict the gradual growth of a crack during structural health monitoring
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know