Performance of the Wrist-worn Actigraph GT3X + in Measuring Physical Activity in Older Women
2021
- 238Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage238
- Downloads139
- Abstract Views99
Artifact Description
Introduction: Being able to accurately measure physical activity intensity and energy expenditure is crucial to understanding the role physical activity plays in lowering the risk for disease. This thesis aims to examine the performance of the wrist-worn GT3X+ in measuring PAEE and classifying activity intensity in a healthy non-obese population of older women. Methods: Baseline data collected in the Women’s Energy Expenditure in Walking Programs Study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01722136) were used. PAEE was measured concurrently for 2 weeks using the doubly labeled water method in combination with indirect calorimetry, the GT3X+ ActiGraph accelerometer (GT3X+, ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL), and the SenseWear Armband Mini monitor (SWAM, BodyMedia Inc. Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Results: The GT3X+ showed a moderate correlation with the SWAM and DLW and IC in measuring PAEE. When estimating time spent in activity intensity, the GT3X+ underestimated sedentary time and overestimated activity intensity when compared to the SWAM. Furthermore, during the Epoch by Epoch analysis, the GT3X+ misclassified light intensity activity as MVPA 71.96% of the time. Conclusion: The currently available PAEE estimation equations do not allow us to accurately measure PAEE with the wrist-worn GT3X+ in a population of older women. Furthermore, when compared to the SWAM, the cut points available for the GT3X+ tend to overestimate time spent in light intensity activity and MVPA and underestimate sedentary time when worn on the wrist.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know