The Immersion Process: Cross-Cultural Language Learning
Page: 1-29
2017
- 948Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage948
- Downloads645
- Abstract Views303
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study seeks to analyze the effects of motivation, awareness, and the immersion process through study abroad on foreign language production. Three participants were analyzed, two of which studied abroad and one who did not (my control case). Two of the three participants lacked the variable of awareness, measured as perception and reflection on language learning development, while only one participant (Participant M) who studied abroad in both Costa Rica and Spain, was made aware of her own learning process via a language learner’s journal and monthly recorded conversations. By studying abroad in two Spanish-speaking countries, Participant M selfreported the effects of cross-cultural language learning. The results of the study also showed a greater increase in Spanish fluency as measured by improvements in grammar and speed of response by the two participants who studied abroad compared to the participant who did not go abroad. Although all three participants scored high in a motivation scale, and therefore, it would be predicted that all three would score high in the willingness to communicate (WTC) index, only the two participants who studied abroad exhibited more confidence in their Spanish-speaking abilities and were more likely to engage in conversation than the participant in the classroom setting. The results seem to indicate students who study abroad are more likely to maintain and improve their Spanish than students who are taught solely in a classroom setting.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know