An Analysis of the Economic, Environmental, and Ethical Benefits of Reprocessing Single Use Medical Devices
2019
- 104Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage104
- Abstract Views104
Artifact Description
Since the 1970s, hospitals around the world, particularly in the United States, Canada and Europe, have employed the practice of reprocessing medical devices intended for single use. Single use devices (SUDs) include blood pressure cuffs, deep vein thrombosis compression sleeves, harmonic scalpels, endoscopic trocars, balloon inflation devices, and many more. However, as these devices became less expensive to fabricate, they became more economically viable to dispose of after one use. In recent years, companies like Stryker and Johnson & Johnson have expanded the reprocessing market. These corporations have proven that third party reprocessing can save hospitals millions of dollars in costs, as well as divert millions of pounds of biohazardous waste from landfills and create a more sustainable medical market. The market is still in its early stages, so there is a lot more room for it to grow from its $1.64B global market share. This poster will delve into the Economic, Environmental, and Ethical benefits from reprocessing single use medical devices for all parties involved: the third party reprocessor, the hospital, the patient, the sterilization company, and the insurance company.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know