Accomodative Multiculturalism: Alternatif Pendekatan terhadap Masalah Keragaman di Asia Tenggara
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, ISSN: 1411-5492, Vol: 9, Issue: 2, Page: 166-186
2007
- 159Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage159
- Downloads91
- Abstract Views68
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This paper will explore the Asian way of dealing with religious, ethnic, and cultural diversity and how it dif fers from the Western liberal democratic model of multiculturalism. As argued by Samuel Huntington, glob alization is causing increasing interactions between peoples who previously would not have had any interac tion with each other. These interactions intensify identity consciousness and awareness of differences. In South-East Asia, as in other parts of the world, this means the rise of indigenous ri hts, majority-minority g power-sharing and the need to reconceptualize the idea of diversity and citizenship. The paper will examine how South-East Asian people would approach these issues, using mainly their cultural and reli iou tools. These tools are often referred to and are widely accepted as Asian Values, and include concepts such as har mony, concensus and commonality. The paper will also show that multiculturalism in Asia may not fit the concepts and models of Western's (liberal) multiculturalism.
Bibliographic Details
http://global.ir.fisip.ui.ac.id/index.php/global/article/view/266; http://global.ir.fisip.ui.ac.id/index.php/global/article/viewFile/266/178; http://dx.doi.org/10.7454/global.v9i2.266; https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/global/vol9/iss2/4; https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1088&context=global; https://dx.doi.org/10.7454/global.v9i2.266
Universitas Indonesia, Directorate of Research and Public Service
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know