Status Hukum Crew Interactive Mobile Companion (CIMON) sebagai Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Misi Luar Angkasa di International Space Station (ISS) berdasarkan Hukum Ruang Angkasa
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol: 53, Issue: 4
2023
- 203Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage203
- Downloads119
- Abstract Views84
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Humans require assistance to support the tasks assigned to them to achieve the predetermined success in a space mission. Consequently, humans have developed artificial intelligence technology. One of the AI technologies utilized is the Crew Interactive Mobile Companion (CIMON), which results from collaboration between several space agencies and organizations, both government and private. Based on space law regulations, CIMON AI raises questions as it serves two main functions in space law: as an astronaut with a legal personality and as an object launched into space. This study aims to examine the legal status of CIMON AI in space law and analyze the safety standardization aspects of using CIMON AI on the International Space Station from the perspective of space law. It turns out that CIMON AI doesn’t have a legal personality based on corpus juris spatialis because it’s a space object whose legal responsibility is attached to the entity authorized to manage CIMON AI which now still has to increase its attention to safety standards due to inadequate legal arrangements which can ensure the implementation of activities in outer space runs according to the regulations applicable in space.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know