Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Bangun Ruang SMP dengan Pendekatan SAVI (Somatik, Auditori, Visual, dan Intelektual)
PYTHAGORAS Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, ISSN: 1978-4538, Vol: 9, Issue: 2, Page: 175-185
2014
- 21Usage
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage21
- Downloads18
- Abstract Views3
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menghasilkan perangkat pembelajaran bangun ruang SMP dengan menggunakan pendekatan SAVI yang layak yaitu valid, praktis, dan efektif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah pengembangan. Penelitian pengembangan ini menggunakan model 4-D yang dikembangkan oleh Thiagarajan, Semmel dan Semmel. Pengembangan perangkat terdiri dari tahap analisis awal-akhir, analisis siswa, analisis materi, analisis tugas, spesifikasi tujuan pembelajaran, pemilihan media, pemilihan format, desain produk, uji ahli, uji coba terbatas dan uji coba lapangan. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 52 orang yang terdiri dari dua kelas yang berasal dari siswa SMPN 5 Sumbawa Besar dan SMPN 2 Unter Iwes. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan terdiri dari lembar validasi, lembar observasi keterlaksanaan pembelajaran, lembar penilaian sisiwa, lembar penilain guru, dan tes prestasi belajar. Analisis data dilakukan secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran berupa silabus, Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) dan Lembar Kegiatan Siswa (LKS) yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis dan efektif serta Tes Prestasi Belajar (TPB) yang valid dan reliabel.Kata kunci: pengembangan, perangkat pembelajaran, bangun ruang, pendekatan SAVIDeveloping the Solid Geometry Teaching Kit for Junior High School Using SAVI Approach (Somatic, Auditory, Visual, and Intellectual)AbstractThe aim of this study was to produce the solid geometry teaching kit for junior high schools which use SAVI approach that is valid, practical, and effective. This was a developmental research using a 4-D model by Thiagarajan, Semmel and Semmel. The developmental process consisted of front-end analysis, learner analysis, task analysis, concept analysis, specifying instructional objectives, format selection, product design, expert validation, small try-out, and field try-out. There were 52 subjects from two junior high schools namely SMPN 5 Sumbawa Besar and SMPN 2 Unter Iwes. This research instruments consisted of validation sheets, learning observation sheets, students evaluation sheets, teachers evaluation sheets and test. The data were analyzed descriptively.This research results revealed that the syllabus, lesson plan, and student work sheet which were developed are valid, practical, and effective, and achievement test is valid and reliabel. Keywords: developing, teaching kit, solid geometry, SAVI approach
Bibliographic Details
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know