The Effect of Aortic Valve Replacement on Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Aortic Valvular Disease
Vol: 34, Issue: 3, Page: 193-196
1986
- 149Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage149
- Downloads144
- Abstract Views5
Article Description
Despite improved surgical techniques and survival in patients following aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and aortic insufficiency, the proper timing for surgery remains controversial. The incomplete reversibility of left ventricular dysfunction remains a concern, and postoperative improvement of left ventricular function is not consistently demonstrated. We studied 11 patients with aortic stenosis and nine patients with aortic insufficiency using angiographic and radioisotope assessment of left ventricular function preoperatively. Postoperative left ventricular function was assessed over nine to 13 months by radioisotope multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan. All patients with impaired left ventricular function preoperatively showed slow but significant recovery toward a normal left ventricular ejection fraction by nine to 13 months postoperatively. Patients with aortic stenosis or aortic insufficiency and depressed left ventricular function can clearly obtain substantial, albeit delayed, improvement after valve replacement.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know