Efficacy and safety of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate for management of multiple sclerosis: A single center retrospective study
Neurology, Vol: 94, Issue: 15, Page: 3
2020
- 28Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage28
- Abstract Views28
Conference Paper Description
Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).Background: Fingolimod was the very first oral disease modifying therapy (oDMT) approved by FDA in 2010 for treatment of RMS. It has changed the therapeutic paradigm of the disease. ODMT are now commonly used as a first line of treatment.Design/Methods: Retrospective chart review of patient’s with multiple sclerosis (MS), treated with fingolimod and DMF was performed. Patients demographics, duration of disease, type of MS, side effects of medications, clinical and radiographic data were recorded. We performed a survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier methods and cox proportional hazards modeling and report hazard ratio of relapse and MRI lesions.Results: Our study population consisted of 141 patients: 111(79%) on DMT and 30(21%) on Fingolimod. Median(IQR) age was 50(42–56), 76% female, and 59% White. Median(IQR) disease duration was 12(8–19) years and time on oDMT was 2.8 (1.2–3.9) years. The percentage of patients who experienced side-effects was 40%; with flushing common in DMF(23% vs 0%, p<0.01) and bradycardia common in Fingolimod(10% vs 1%, p<0.01). Median(IQR) time to first relapse post-oDMT initiation was 1.2 (0.2–2.9) years with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Median (IQR) time to new/enhanced brain T2 MRI lesion post-oDMT initiation was shorter for DMF compared to Fingolimod: 0.9(0.2–1.5) vs 1.4(0.7–2.3), respectively(p<0.01).Conclusions: The interesting finding of our study is a shorter median (IQR) time to new or enhanced Brain MRI lesions in DMF group compared to Fingolimod group. The time to first relapse was not significantly different between groups. The limitation of our study is a small sample size and retrospective design. The complete data analysis of over 300 patients will be presented at AAN 2020.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know