Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Pancoast Tumors: A National Cancer Database Analysis
J Am Coll Surg, Vol: 235, Issue: 5, Page: 0
2022
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Conference Paper Description
INTRODUCTION: Pancoast tumors represent 5% of non-small cell lung cancers. Complete surgical resection and no lymphadenopathy are important positive prognostic factors. Previous literature has identified neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery as standard of care. But many institutions choose upfront surgery. Our goal was to identify treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with node-negative Pancoast tumors using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).METHODS: The NCDB was queried from 2004 through 2017 for all patients who had undergone surgery for Pancoast tumors. Treatment patterns, including the percentage who received neoadjuvant treatment, were recorded. Logistic regression and survival analyses were used to determine outcomes based on different treatment patterns. Secondary analyses were performed on patients who received upfront surgery.RESULTS: A total of 2,910 patients were included in the study. Overall 30-day and 90-day mortality were 3% and 7% respectively. Only 25% (717/2,910) of the group received neoadjuvant chemoradiation before surgery. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation experienced improved 90-day survival (OR 0.63, p < 0.01) and overall survival (OR 0.94, p < 0.01; Fig. 1). When analyzing patients who received upfront surgery, adjuvant chemoradiation treatment was associated with improved survival compared to no treatment after surgery (OR 0.87, p < 0.01).CONCLUSION: Patients with Pancoast tumors receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment in only a quarter of cases. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is associated with improved survival compared to upfront surgery. When surgery is performed first, adjuvant chemoradiation treatment improves survival. These results suggest significant underutilization of standard of care for patients with Pancoast tumors.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know