Impact of patient age on clinical features, serologic test reactivity and long-term outcome of culture-confirmed early Lyme disease
2017
- 20Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage20
- Abstract Views20
Article Description
Whether age at time of diagnosis impacts the clinical presentation or long-term outcome of early Lyme disease is unknown. Subjects enrolled in this study had culture-confirmed early Lyme disease and were followed up annually in a long-term prospective study. Subjects ≤50years of age were compared with those who were ≥51years of age at time of study entry. Of the 283 enrolled subjects, the ≥51year old age group was significantly more likely to be female (P=0.0095) and to be compliant with long-term follow-up of at least 11years duration (P=0.0119). There were no significant differences between the two age groups with regard to any of the other variables assessed at presentation. For the 128 subjects who were followed up for 11-20years, there was no significant difference between the two age groups in the frequency, number or type of residual symptoms. The older age group at study entry, however, was significantly more likely to develop an intercurrent comorbidity (P=0.0017), and there was a trend toward a greater likelihood of having an intercurrent hospitalization (P=0.0311). Among the 128 subjects followed up for 11-20years, the older age group at study entry returned for a significantly greater number of follow-up visits (P=0.0129). In conclusion, older age at the time of diagnosis of early Lyme disease did not impact the initial clinical features or long-term outcome of this infection. Not unexpectedly, older patients had more comorbidities during long-term follow-up.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know