Literature-Based Scientific Learning: A Collaboration Model
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, ISSN: 0099-1333, Vol: 33, Issue: 6, Page: 684-691
2007
- 15Citations
- 38Usage
- 75Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef14
- Usage38
- Abstract Views38
- Captures75
- Readers75
- 75
Article Description
Amidst exponential growth of knowledge, student insights into the knowledge creation practices of the scientific community can be furthered by science faculty collaborations with university librarians. The Literature-Based Scientific Learning model advances undergraduates' disciplinary mastery and information literacy through experience with primary literature research practices and scientific scholarly communication traditions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133307001802; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.007; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=36549034754&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099133307001802; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0099133307001802?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0099133307001802?httpAccept=text/plain; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/libraries-articles/22; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=libraries-articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.007
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know