Kilduff, Marshall: Jim Jones support from politicians
2010
- 47Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage47
- Abstract Views45
- Downloads1
- Plays1
Interview Description
Marshall Kilduff: If you’re a politician and you want to get ahead, you have to be open to a lot of opportunities and options. I think Moscone was not different than a lot of others in that he saw what appeared to be a good-guy operation that was willing to hear his side, wanted to help him, and would really turn out in a finger-snap. Other politicians in San Francisco at the time: Harvey Milk, Willie Brown, certainly national democrats who wanted to bring a candidate through San Francisco; they would all call on Jones to fill a room, to show up at a speech, to make their guy or girl to look really good. To that extent, Moscone’s in a way guilty, but also it’s typical of a kind of outlook or approach. What I found unacceptable was that even after the news stories, and even after a casual interview by a politician to another politician, or any kind of due diligence that these guys could put into this affair, they didn’t care. They stuck with this guy. They continued to defend him. They continued to find him noteworthy or not worth dismissing. He was still in orbit. He was still in their world, and that to me just seemed cynical beyond belief.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know