Effects of Range and Frequency on DIDSON Measurement Accuracy
2012
- 64Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage64
- Abstract Views64
Poster Description
The DIDSON Sonar is a multi-beam acoustic camera that produces near video quality images in two frequencies (low-1.1MHz and high- 1.8MHz). DIDSON is particularly useful in murky or rough waters because targets within the field-of-view are imaged through sound waves rather than traditional video imagery. Although studies have been conducted as to the accuracy and precision of estimating length with the DIDSON, none in which range and frequency were analyzed simultaneously have been conducted. Our artificial target was manually operated in a controlled pool environment and lengths were measured by the Fish-Marking tool in the DIDSON software. We had four test groups: low frequency at 5 m, high frequency at 5 m, low frequency at 10 m and high frequency at 10 m. The statistical analysis revealed that target range had a significant effect on DIDSON derived measurements while frequency did not. DIDSON-derived length measurements were significantly smaller than the actual target length at both ranges tested.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know