Effects of noise and age on the infant brainstem response to speech
Clinical Neurophysiology, ISSN: 1388-2457, Vol: 129, Issue: 12, Page: 2623-2634
2018
- 15Citations
- 32Usage
- 67Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef6
- Usage32
- Abstract Views32
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Article Description
Background noise makes hearing speech difficult for people of all ages. This difficulty can be exacerbated by co-occurring developmental deficits that often emerge in childhood. Sentence-type speech-in-noise (SIN) tests are available clinically but cannot be administered to very young individuals. Our objective was to examine the use of an electrophysiological test of SIN, suitable for infants, to track developmental trajectories. Speech-evoked brainstem potentials were recorded from 30 typically-developing infants in quiet and +10 dB SNR background noise. Infants were divided into two age groups (7–12 and 18–24 months) and examined across development. Spectral power of the frequency following response (FFR) was computed using a fast Fourier Transform. Cross-correlations between quiet and noise responses were computed to measure encoding resistance to noise. Older infants had more robust FFR encoding in noise and had higher quiet-noise correlations than their younger counterparts. No group differences were observed in the quiet condition. By two years of age, infants show less vulnerability to the disruptive effects of background noise, compared to infants under 12 months. Speech-in-noise electrophysiology can be easily recorded across infancy and provides unique insights into developmental differences that tests conducted in quiet may miss.
Bibliographic Details
https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/audiology-articles/8; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/shs-all/121
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138824571831191X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.08.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053730790&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241978; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S138824571831191X; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/audiology-articles/8; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=audiology-articles; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/shs-all/121; https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=shs-all; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2018.08.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know