Promoting an Accessible Learning Environment for Students with Disabilities via Faculty Development (Practice Brief)
Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 91-99
2019
- 15Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage15
- Abstract Views15
Article Description
Faculty members' positive attitudes, active engagement, and receptiveness to inclusive instructional practices may contribute to the retention and success of students with disabilities (SWDs). However, most faculty members are not adequately prepared to effectively implement inclusive instruction, and many remain uninformed regarding the functional impact of specific disabilities on academic performance. This practice brief describes a sustainable, year-long, five-module faculty development program that includes universal design of instruction, characteristics of diverse learners, accessible online learning, disability-related laws and regulations, a panel dialogue with SWDs, and a final project that involved disseminating, integrating, and applying knowledge and skills learned during the program. Results from pre- and post-training questionnaires indicated significant improvements in faculty members' willingness to accommodate SWDs, provide accessible materials, and cultivate inclusive classroom environments, as well as in their understanding of disability law and concepts and of the accessibility of campus resources.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know