The effects of two counseling models, values clarification, and cognitive behavior modification on reading improvement and self concept
Page: 144
1983
- 82Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage82
- Downloads45
- Abstract Views37
Thesis / Dissertation Description
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two counseling models, values clarification and cognitive behavior modification on the improvement of reading skills and the enhancement of self-concept . The subjects were 137 tenth grade students at a central California high school. Two experimental groups and one control group with approximately 25 students each were pre- and posttested with a Nelson Reading Test, Form A and B, and a semantic differential. One experimental group received values clarification training, the other cognitive behavior modification training. The study was replicated once for validity. It was hypothesized that both experimental groups would show significant mean gains in reading on the Nelson Reading Test and also on each of the concepts of the semantic differential, as compared with each other and with the control group. It was also hypothesized that males and females would have equal mean gains in treatment effects. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) . Analysis of covariance was used to analyze the results wlth an explication of the comparisons between groups where the senklntic differential was used. Fisher's LSD Multiple Comparison Test was used with the Nelson Reading Test where statistical significance was indicated from the analysis of covariance. The alpha level was set at .05. The findings revealed that on the semantic differential, neither cognitive behavior modification nor values clarification showed significant gains. There were no significant findings in gender differences . There was a significant finding with the results for the experimental groups for values clarification. Both groups showed a gain of approximately one grade level on the Nelson Reading Test between pre- and post-test.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know