The Influence of Third Parties, Perfectionism, and Familial Socioeconomic Status on College Student Mental Health and Perceptions of Social Support
2021
- 327Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage327
- Downloads269
- Abstract Views58
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Mental health has long been a fruitful area of sociological inquiry, and much remains to be illuminated about the ways in which the social context and intrapersonal factors intersect to impact individuals’ psychological wellbeing. Among college students particularly, stresses such as academic pressure and interpersonal conflicts contribute to the degradation of mental health. While sociological theories such as the stress process perspective have long been employed to study linkages between stress and mental wellbeing among this population, few studies have examined the specific characteristics of social relationships most beneficial to students in distress. Utilizing survey responses collected from both public and private Ivy League undergraduates throughout the northeastern U.S., I create a framework to identify and measure specific dimensions of social relationships; I first find that certain aspects of third party relationships, including emotional closeness and social status, remain more relevant for college student mental health outcomes than others. I then build upon my initial examination by incorporating perfectionism into the conceptual model; I ultimately conclude that perfectionism types differentially impact psychological wellbeing, and the influence of certain perfectionism dimensions varies based on cultural aspects of third party relationships. Finally, I examine the impact of socioeconomic status on students’ relationships, noting that familial SES can both amplify and protect against mental distress by shaping the influence of certain social relationships, particularly with respect to siblings. Ultimately, the framework I created and the conclusions gleaned through utilizing it begin to further nuance empirical understanding of the complexities of social and psychological determinants of mental health among college students.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know