Elasticity in Microstructure Sensitive Design Through the use of Hill Bounds
2002
- 90Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage90
- Downloads73
- Abstract Views17
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In engineering, materials are often assumed to be homogeneous and isotropic; in actuality, material properties do change with sample direction and location. This variation is due to the anisotropy of the individual grains and their spatial distribution in the material. Currently there is a lack of communication between the design engineer, material scientist, and processor for solving multi-objective/constrained designs. If communication existed between these groups then materials could be designed for applications, instead of the reverse. Microstructure sensitive design introduces a common language, a spectral representation, where both design properties and microstructures are expressed. Using Hill bounds, effective elastic properties are expressed within the spectral representation. For the elastic properties, two FCC materials, copper and nickel, were chosen for computation and to demonstrate how symmetry enters into the methodology. This spectral representation renders properties as hyper-surfaces that translate through a multi-dimensional Fourier space depending on the property value of the hyper-surface. Property closures are generated by condensing the information contained within the multi-dimensional Fourier space into a 2-D representation. This compaction of information is beneficial for a quick determination of property limits for a particular alloy system. The design engineer can now dictate the critical design properties and receive sets of microstructures that satisfy the design objectives.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know