The four 'R's of openness and ALMS analysis: Frameworks for open educational resources
Open Learning, ISSN: 0268-0513, Vol: 25, Issue: 1, Page: 37-44
2010
- 138Citations
- 4Usage
- 226Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations138
- Citation Indexes125
- 125
- CrossRef47
- Policy Citations13
- 13
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
- Captures226
- Readers226
- 226
Article Description
A significant movement in education concerns the use of open educational resources. By 'open' it is generally meant that the resource is available at no cost to others for adaptation and reuse in different contexts. However, 'open' is not a simple dichotomy; rather, there is a continuum of openness. We discuss four separate aspects of reuse and demonstrate how these describe different levels of openness. We discuss how the licensing and technical aspects of open educational resources affect the relative openness of an open educational resource. Implications for those creating open educational resources are discussed. © 2010 The Open University.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79957470072&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680510903482132; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02680510903482132; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02680510903482132; https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/3359; https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4323&context=facpub
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know