Modelling social learning during participatory modeling processes
2020
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Downloads3
- Abstract Views1
Lecture / Presentation Description
It is evident that participatory modelling is a useful approach when dealing with wicked, multi-actor, multi-perspective problems, such as the energy transition or climate change. Literature considers social learning to be the process taking place during participatory modelling. It is understood as the process of co-creation of knowledge, leading to convergence of goals and criteria, and a change in behaviour. While it is a key concept in the field of participatory modelling, the basic processes that drive social learning in this context remain unclear. This lack of a consistent theoretical basis diminishes our ability to consistently and purposefully design participatory processes and increase their effectiveness. We theorize that social learning is an emergent pattern, arising out of social (inter)actions of individuals over time, taking place during and around participatory modelling. Actors negotiate and conceptualize a situation, and use this conceptualisation as the basis for formalizing a model. This process is subject to differences in opinions; social mechanisms, such as status or power; different - and possibly - conflicting goals, perspectives, and rationalities. During these social (inter)actions, actors co-create knowledge by integrating and transforming shared knowledge. What these actions are precisely and how they lead to social learning is unclear. Concepts from social psychology and communication sciences about information processing and its impact on the thoughts and behaviour of participants offer a useful starting point. In order to systematically explore these concepts, we are developing an agent based model of the participatory modelling process, focusing on psychological and social processes within and between individuals during this process. We will present our model design and initial findings in how the model compares to a reference case study. Furthermore, we discuss possible development directions and potential impacts on process design.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know