The Promise and Perils of Radical Left Populism: The Case of Venezuela
Journal of World-Systems Research, Vol: 24, Issue: 2, Page: 277-292
2018
- 2Citations
- 1,084Usage
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Usage1,084
- Downloads1,046
- 1,046
- Abstract Views38
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Article Description
Mainstream critics argue that populism inevitably leads to economic disaster and political authoritarianism. Venezuela is often pointed to as proof of this. Yet, while the profound crisis gripping Venezuela is undeniable, comprehensive analysis of Chavismo shows that populism, and specifically the radical left populism found in Venezuela, is more ambiguous. From 2005-2013 radical left populism in Venezuela reduced poverty and inequality, deepened democracy, and built popular support for a "transition to socialism." These gains were erased in the post-2014 crisis, which revealed two flaws of the Chavista model hidden by its earlier success: its unsustainable material foundation and inability to overcome the statist trap. For radical left populism to achieve its potential, and avoid peril, these two problems must be effectively addressed.
Bibliographic Details
http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/jwsr/article/view/868; http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/jwsr/article/download/868/1169; http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2018.868; https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/lacs_fac_scholar/35; https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=lacs_fac_scholar; https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2018.868
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know