Restoration and Balancing of a Cross Section of the Mt. Crandell Duplex, Waterton National Park, Canada
2023
- 65Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage65
- Downloads49
- Abstract Views16
Poster Description
Cross-section balancing provides a useful tool for checking the potential viability of structural interpretations through complexly deformed terranes. Balanced cross sections contain structures that are similar to those observed in outcrop or on seismic profiles in the area, that can be restored to a realistic pre-deformational configuration of faults and undeformed strata where areas are preserved between the deformed and restored states, and whose development from the undeformed state can be described in a kinematically reasonable sequence. Quick-look inspection of cross sections greatly facilitates the balancing process by comparing corresponding hanging wall and footwall features (particularly focusing on ramps and flats) to identify areas in a cross section that may contain balancing issues. The well-known Boyer and Elliott (1982) cross section through the Mt. Crandell duplex in Waterton National Park in Alberta, Canada and its accompanying restoration have long served as a classic example of a balanced cross section. We carefully examined the section and its restoration using quick-look techniques, and noted several structures that had substantially changed their shape between the deformed and restored states, had ramp-flat mismatches between the hanging wall and footwall, and/or had significant area changes between the deformed and restored states. Using cross-section restoration software, we not only quantified differences between their deformed-state and restored-state cross sections, but we also rigorously restored their original section. Specifically, we identified differences where restored layer areas ranged from 18.3% to 186% of the areas of their deformed counterparts, with some layers missing or incomplete. In addition, the computerized restoration revealed multiple issues with ramp-flat geometries that produced substantial gaps and overlaps not reflected in the original restoration. Based on careful examination of these problematic areas, we are currently working on refining the Boyer and Elliott (1982) deformed-state cross section to address these issues.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know