Teaching Gender as a Core Value in Business Organizations Class
Oklahoma City University Law Review, Vol: 36, Page: 545
2011
- 54Usage
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage54
- Downloads51
- Abstract Views3
Article Description
(Excerpt)I teach a business organizations course that is typically a large class with up to ninety students. At some point in the first week of each semester, I talk about public companies and the men who lead them. I point out to my students that while it is appropriate in most contexts to use gender-neutral language, it would be inaccurate to do so when talking about big business. Only fifteen percent of the board seats at Fortune 500 companies are held by women, and only sixteen percent of Fortune 500 corporate officers are women. I let my students know that when we talk about business organizations, particularly big business, we are talking about class, race, and gender-we are talking about affluent white men.Most years, we also talked about people of color and women in my business organizations course. This was easy to do after two large class actions were filed in the 1990s against Texaco and Coca-Cola alleging race discrimination and as the huge sex-discrimination class action against Wal-Mart unfolded. We talked about the power of shareholders to communicate with each other about discriminatory corporate cultures through the shareholder-proposal process. We also discussed communication between shareholder activists and corporate management through the process of demand in the derivative-litigation context. And, as the subprime debacle unfolded, we talked about fiduciary duty and the mortgage companies that targeted communities of color for subprime loans even when borrowers had good credit records. But, when there is no big news story involving women or people of color, it is difficult to bring the discussion into a survey course taken by students who want to learn the basics of business for the bar examination or for a career in the corporate world.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know