Abusive: Dodd-Frank Section 1031 and the Continuing Struggle To Protect Consumers
Vol: 85, Issue: 3
2014
- 907Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage907
- Downloads860
- Abstract Views47
Artifact Description
(Excerpt)This Note first contextualizes the need for Section 1031 by examining the roots and shortcomings of existing consumer protection law embodied in unfairness, deception, and unconscionability doctrines. Part II chronicles the enactment of Section 1031, paying close attention to the Administration's proposed definitions for unfair, deceptive, and abusive practices, and Congress's replies. Part III applies the enacted definition of "abusive" to several widespread practices in the consumer credit market, and urges the CFPB to adopt a broad interpretation of the term as consistent with Congress's longstanding intent to protect consumers.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know