PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Rule 55: Why Broadly Interpreting "Otherwise Defend" Protects a Diligent Party's Rights and Encourages an Orderly and Efficient Judicial System

Vol: 88, Issue: 2
2015
  • 0
    Citations
  • 2,883
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Artifact Description

(Excerpt)This Note argues that a uniform interpretation of "otherwise defend" is needed. Part I of this Note discusses the history and purpose of Rule 55, the procedure for entries of default and default judgment, and other alternatives to Rule 55 default judgments. Part II of this Note examines how the language "otherwise defend" has been interpreted differently by the federal circuit courts. Part III of this Note argues that the majority's broad interpretation of "otherwise defend" should be adopted as the uniform interpretation because it is supported by statutory interpretation and the underlying purpose of Rule 55.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know