NCLB Technology and a Rural School
The Rural Educator, ISSN: 0273-446X, Vol: 28, Issue: 1, Page: 10-17
2006
- 3Citations
- 283Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage283
- Downloads209
- Abstract Views74
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
The requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) have presented special challenges and opportunities for rural schools (Reeves, 2003). Researchers have suggested that one way rural schools may be able to overcome these challenges is through an increase in the level of technology integration in their school (Collins & Dewees, 2001). This case study reports on one school’s attempt to use grant resources funded through NCLB to integrate specific instructional technologies to facilitate increased student achievement. Through interviews and observations, the roles, attitudes, and difficulties of teachers and administrators in implementing a technology initiative in a rural middle school were observed, examined and discussed. Emerging themes included issues related to teacher ownership of the technology, teacher feelings of power and participation, differing goals of teachers and administrators, technical difficulties, school wide support, and changes in school culture.
Bibliographic Details
https://orc.library.atu.edu/faculty_pub_curr/27; https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ruraleducator/vol28/iss1/2
https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ruraleducator/vol28/iss1/2; http://dx.doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v28i1.485; https://orc.library.atu.edu/faculty_pub_curr/27; https://orc.library.atu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=faculty_pub_curr; https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1252&context=ruraleducator; https://dx.doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v28i1.485; https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ruraleducator/vol28/iss1/2/
Mississippi State University Libraries - DIGITAL COMMONS JOURNALS
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know