The mechanics of precision presplitting
2019
- 2,590Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,590
- Downloads2,339
- 2,339
- Abstract Views251
Thesis / Dissertation Description
"Precision Presplitting is a widely used method of presplit blasting for the mining and construction industries. In recent years considerable effort has gone into the development of empirical equations based on field data to be able to better design the Precision Presplit for various rock types and structural environments. However, the most widely discussed theory about the mechanics of the presplit formation, that of shockwave collisions, does not appear to be applicable for this method of presplitting.This research has disproven this theory based on insufficient magnitude of the shockwave from modeling with basic wave mechanics. Other authors have suggested alternative theories based on the gas pressurization of the borehole. Recently the concept of hoop stresses as a result of the gas pressurization of the borehole was suggested. No method to analyze the gas pressurization of the borehole and magnitude of the hoop stresses existed. This research seeks to develop the basic theory to determine the hoop stress field for a Precision Presplit blast, using basic laws from thermodynamics and mechanics of materials to present a mathematical proof to determine the borehole pressure from a decoupled charge and the magnitude of the hoop stress developed in the rock.This modelling approach analyzes the stress from both the shockwave and gas pressure, which are quantified and compared to the tensile strength of the rock. This research shows that the shockwave magnitude is much too low to cause presplit formation while the hoop stress has sufficient magnitude to cause the split"--Abstract, page iii.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know