Machine learning based source reconstruction for RF desense
IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, ISSN: 0018-9375, Vol: 60, Issue: 6, Page: 1640-1647
2018
- 59Citations
- 16Usage
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations59
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef27
- Usage16
- Abstract Views16
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
In radio frequency interference study, equivalent dipole moments are widely used to reconstruct real radiation noise sources. Previous reconstruction methods, such as least square method (LSQ) and optimization method are affected by parameter selections, such as number and locations of dipole moments and choices of initial values. In this paper, a new machine learning based source reconstruction method is developed to extract the equivalent dipole moments more accurately and reliably. Based on the near-field patterns, the proposed method can determine the minimal number of dipole moments and their corresponding locations. Furthermore, the magnitude and phase for each dipole moment can be extracted. The proposed method can extract the dominant dipole moments for the unknown noise sources one by one. The proposed method is applied to a few theoretical examples first. The measurement validation using a test board and a practical cellphone are also given. Compared to the conventional LSQ method, the proposed machine learning based method is believed to have a better accuracy. Also, it is more reliable in handling noise in practical applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041552568&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/temc.2018.2797132; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8286899/; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ele_comeng_facwork/3545; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4550&context=ele_comeng_facwork
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know