Static output-feedback synchronisation of multi-agent systems: A secure and unified approach
IET Control Theory and Applications, ISSN: 1751-8652, Vol: 12, Issue: 8, Page: 1095-1106
2018
- 16Citations
- 26Usage
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef13
- Usage26
- Abstract Views26
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
In this study, a unified distributed static output-feedback (OPFB) control protocol is presented for multi-agent systems. The proposed approach is unified in the sense that it is applicable to both homogeneous and heterogeneous multi-agent systems. Despite its importance, distributed OPFB control design is not considered for heterogeneous systems in the literature. Moreover, as will be shown, existing static OPFB controllers for homogeneous systems are vulnerable to attacks on sensors and actuators. More precisely, it is shown that a compromised agent can make an intact agent turn away from the leader if there is a directed path of any length from the compromised agent to the intact agent. To overcome these shortcomings, a distributed OPFB controller is presented which is (i) applicable to both homogeneous and heterogeneous systems, and (ii) is resilient against attacks on sensors and actuators. The proposed framework prevents attacks on sensors and actuators from propagating across the network and, thus, guarantees synchronisation of intact agents to the leader. To further improve the resiliency and guarantee synchronisation of even compromised agents, a disturbance compensator is designed. A significant advantage of this approach is that no assumption on topological connectivity and the number of agents under attack is required.
Bibliographic Details
https://orc.library.atu.edu/faculty_pub_elec/54; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ele_comeng_facwork/3692
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046094929&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1068; https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1068; https://orc.library.atu.edu/faculty_pub_elec/54; https://orc.library.atu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=faculty_pub_elec; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/ele_comeng_facwork/3692; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4697&context=ele_comeng_facwork; https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1068
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know