Is Newmark Method Conservative?
2001
- 784Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage784
- Downloads762
- Abstract Views22
Conference Paper Description
Newmark method is a commonly accepted practice in geotechnical earthquake engineering to estimate seismically induced displacement of earth structures. The method currently requires performing a series of analyses using multiple computer programs to 1) identify a potential sliding mass, 2) compute a factor of safety, 3) calculate a yield acceleration, and 4) perform a double integration of that portion of a given horizontal acceleration history that exceeds the yield acceleration. The Newmark method provides satisfactory results for a horizontal sliding surface. However, for an inclined sliding surface the result is unconservative and for a nonplanar one is not clear. To avoid the problems and to facilitate the Newmark method a numerical technique was developed and a computer program was written to carry out the analysis. A single analysis determines a two-dimensional pattern of seismically induced displacement due to given earthquake motions. Results of analyses for three examples are given to demonstrate the comparison between the new method and the Newmark method.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know