Healing of bone defects in a rodent calvarial defect model using strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds
2015
- 344Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage344
- Downloads273
- Abstract Views71
Thesis / Dissertation Description
"The main objective of this project was to evaluate the capacity of strong porous silicate (13-93) bioactive glass scaffolds prepared by a robocasting technique to regenerate bone and stimulate angiogenesis in a rat calvarial defect model. The scaffolds were created with the same grid-like microstructure but in a variety of formulations: (i) as-fabricated, (ii) pretreated in an aqueous phosphate solution to convert the glass surface to hydroxyapatite, (iii) loaded with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP2) (1 µg per scaffold), and (iv) doped with copper (0.4-2.0 wt. % CuO). When compared to the as-fabricated scaffolds, the pretreated scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration at 6 weeks but not at 12 or 24 weeks. In comparison, the BMP2-loaded scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration at all three implantation times and they were almost completely infiltrated with lamellar bone within 12 weeks. Doping the as-fabricated scaffolds with 0.4 and 0.8 wt. % CuO did not affect the response of preosteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro and bone regeneration in vivo. In comparison, the scaffolds doped with 2.0 wt. % CuO were toxic to the cells in vitro and significantly inhibited bone regeneration at 6 weeks post-implantation. The area of new blood vessels in the new bone that infiltrated the scaffolds at 6 weeks post-implantation was significantly enhanced by the BMP2 loading but not by CuO dopant concentrations of 0.4 and 0.8 wt. %. The fibrous tissue that infiltrated the scaffolds doped with 2.0 wt. % CuO showed a significantly higher blood vessel area than the as-fabricated scaffolds. Loading silicate 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds with BMP2 significantly improved their capacity to regenerate bone in rat calvarial defects at 6 weeks post-implantation when compared to doping the glass with copper"--Abstract, page iv.
Bibliographic Details
Missouri University of Science and Technology
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know