Combining laser aided ablation and polishing to minimize surface roughness of additively manufactured aluminium components
2020
- 173Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage173
- Downloads159
- Abstract Views14
Thesis / Dissertation Description
“The surface roughness of additively manufactured parts is much higher than the acceptable range for most applications, thus post-processing is needed to qualify these parts for use. Laser polishing can be used to bring the surface roughness in an admissible range, but if the initial roughness is very high then the energy density for the polishing process needs to be very high to achieve a significant reduction in roughness. This high energy density can produce many process defects. Also, laser polishing alone cannot get rid of high wavelength asperities. Any waviness in the part can be linked with initial waviness in the as-built part and to the high energy density used during laser polishing. Waviness makes it harder to achieve dimensional accuracy. In this study, we propose a solution to extensively reduce surface roughness while also mitigating surface waviness, using a combination of laser ablation/machining, laser macro-polishing and laser micro-polishing. Surface roughness (Ra value) of 1.11 μm in one direction and 1.60 μm in another was achieved, which was more than 93% reduction in Ra compared to the as-built part. At the end, a process to achieve dimensional accuracy using pulsed laser ablation/machining is illustrated”--Abstract, page iv.
Bibliographic Details
Missouri University of Science and Technology
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know