Corrigendum to: “Anti-infective and osteointegration properties of silicon nitride, poly-ether-ether-ketone, and titanium implants” [Acta Materialia 8 (2012) 4447–4454]
Acta Biomaterialia, ISSN: 1742-7061, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 1485-1486
2014
- 12Usage
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
- Captures8
- Readers8
Correction Description
The authors apologize for errors in Figs. 3 and 5. The values on the Y-axes for these graphs are incorrect, and should have been divided by 2. The corresponding correct values are shown in Tables 2 and 3 in the article. Given below are corrected graphs. These errors do not affect the statistical outcome or conclusions of the paper.”
Bibliographic Details
http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/1988; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/1988
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1742706113005850; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.018; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84895070781&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1742706113005850; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1742706113005850?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1742706113005850?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/1988; http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2988&context=matsci_eng_facwork; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/1988; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2988&context=matsci_eng_facwork; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.018
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know