Recent trends in the processing of enargite concentrates
Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, ISSN: 1547-7401, Vol: 35, Issue: 5, Page: 283-367
2014
- 50Citations
- 67Usage
- 30Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations50
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef26
- Usage67
- Abstract Views67
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
The copper industry is witnessing great interest in the development and utilization of copper-arsenic deposits. While most plants tend to use traditional processing technologies, the depletion of conventional copper ores has created competition for designing and implementing new process alternatives for the treatment of copper-arsenic ores containing minerals such as enargite, luzonite, and tennantite. Nevertheless, the downstream processing of high-arsenic copper concentrates represents a significant metallurgical challenge in terms of both arsenic separation and also its stabilization in an environmentally benign form that fulfills the current and future environmental policies. Smelters are subject to penalties on high arsenic-bearing copper concentrates. While reductive roasting can drive-off the arsenic from enargite concentrates to an acceptable level suitable for smelting (<0.5 wt.%), this option has generally been viewed as unacceptable due to environmental conflicts and the lack of a market for arsenic trioxide. The lack of a suitable pyrometallurgical option has led to several proposed hydrometallurgical treatments of enargite concentrates. Hydrometallurgical options include either selective arsenic dissolution to produce a clean copper concentrate or collective leaching of copper and arsenic. Both options with various conditions and lixiviants are discussed and evaluated. In this review, alkaline sulfide leach (ASL), sulfate-and chloride-based leach systems, high temperature pressure oxidation (HTPOX), sodium hypochlorite leach, bio-leach/oxidation, nitrogen species catalyzed pressure oxidation, Cominco Engineering Services Limited, Intec, HydroCopper™ and Fluobor® processes are outlined. Pyrometallurgical process strategies have also been briefly reviewed. Among all processing options, ASL, HTPOX, Fluobor® and reductive roasting processes are given special attention with specific flowsheets for enargite concentrates discussed. © 2014 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Bibliographic Details
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/2424; http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/785
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896699732&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2012.723651; http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08827508.2012.723651; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/2424; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3424&context=matsci_eng_facwork; http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/matsci_eng_facwork/785; http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1784&context=matsci_eng_facwork
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know