Interpolation and Extrapolation of Optimally Fitted Kinematic Error Model for Five-Axis Machine Tools
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, ISSN: 1528-8935, Vol: 144, Issue: 5
2022
- 116Usage
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage116
- Downloads106
- Abstract Views10
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Machine tool geometric errors are frequently corrected by populating compensation tables that contain position-dependent offsets to each commanded axis position. While each offset can be determined by directly measuring the individual geometric error at that location, it is often more efficient to compute the compensation using a volumetric error model derived from measurements across the entire axis space. However, interpolation and extrapolation of measurements, once explicit in direct measurement methods, become implicit and obfuscated in the curve-fitting process of volumetric error methods. The drive to maximize model accuracy while minimizing measurement sets can lead to significant model errors in workspace regions at or beyond the range of the metrology equipment. In this paper, a method of constructing machine tool volumetric error models is presented in which the characteristics of the interpolation and extrapolation errors are constrained. Using a typical five-axis machine tool compensation methodology, a constraint bounding the tool tip modeled error slope is added to the error model identification process. By including this constraint over the entire space, the geometric errors over the interpolation space are still well identified. Also, the model performance over the extrapolation space is consistent with the behavior of the geometric error model over the interpolation space. The methodology is applied to an industrial five-axis machine tool. In the experimental implementation, for measurements outside of the measured region, an unconstrained model increases the mean residual by 40% while the constrained model reduces the mean residual by 40%.
Bibliographic Details
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/mec_aereng_facwork/4853; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/mec_aereng_facwork/4941
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85127452738&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4052439; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/manufacturingscience/article/144/5/051003/1119617/Interpolation-and-Extrapolation-of-Optimally; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/mec_aereng_facwork/4853; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6386&context=mec_aereng_facwork; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/mec_aereng_facwork/4941; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6474&context=mec_aereng_facwork; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4052439
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know