Environmental Remediation using High-Pressure Waterjets for Emplacement of Treatment Media
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Water Jetting (2006, Gdansk, Poland)
2006
- 4Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views4
Conference Paper Description
The operation of industrial concerns has, in many cases, the unfortunate consequence of spillage of either toxic or otherwise environmentally undesired chemicals into the ground. These chemicals can either be left in place, or migrate from the initial site, under the course of time and natural events, with significant consequences. However, while the impact of the chemicals can be significant, the relatively low concentrations at which they can create a problem, and the large areas over which they can be spread, can create significant costs for any remedial programs. Two alternate methods are suggested that can be used to mitigate the presence of undesirable chemicals, depending upon the depth and mobility with which they are moving through the ground. The first deals with the injection of a remedial treatment where the contaminating chemical is relatively shallowly buried in a soft sediment (such as a river bed or tidal flat) while the second deals with the more difficult issue of groundwater contamination deeper in the ground, where the water is migrating in a plume through much harder rock.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know