Development of impedance void meter for evaluation of flow symmetry
Annals of Nuclear Energy, ISSN: 0306-4549, Vol: 63, Page: 525-532
2014
- 8Citations
- 11Usage
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef1
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Often it is useful or even necessary to know whether the void fraction is evenly distributed in two-phase flows. In industrial systems, unevenly distributed flows can be a factor in vibrations and other undesirable occurrences. In bubble column chemical reactors, uneven distribution of the void can result in reduced reaction efficiency. In experiments, it is often desirable to have symmetrically distributed void for local measurements since this allows for more rapid data collection. Current systems for determining the symmetry of the void distribution in distributed flows either suffer from very long measurement time requirements or cause significant disturbances to the flow. To address the need for approximate evaluation of flow symmetry without causing excessive disturbance to the flow, a new impedance void meter design has been developed and tested under a variety of conditions. The ability of the new design to evaluate the void distribution symmetry has been tested through comparison with conductivity probe measurements of local void fraction, and the accuracy of the impedance meter has been verified through comparison with the conductivity probe measurements and with typical impedance void meter measurements.
Bibliographic Details
https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/nuclear_facwork/152; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/min_nuceng_facwork/359
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306454913004349; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.026; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884261711&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306454913004349; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0306454913004349?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0306454913004349?httpAccept=text/plain; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/nuclear_facwork/152; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1151&context=nuclear_facwork; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/min_nuceng_facwork/359; https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=min_nuceng_facwork; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.08.026
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know