In Vitro Assessment of Porous Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
2008
- 10Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage10
- Downloads10
Poster Description
Two types of glass scaffolds fabricated from silicate-based 13-93 glass were tested for possible use in bone tissue engineering. The two scaffold types included constructs prepared by a polymer foam infiltration procedure to simulate trabecular bone and sintered glass fiber construct. These scaffolds were seeded with mouse MLO-AS cells, an established line of osteogenic cells used as a model of developing bone tissue. Assays were conducted to assess growth and function of the seeded cells over incubation times ranging from two to six days. Cell adhesion to the scaffolds was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. Quantitative measurements of total cellular protein indicate that the rate of cell growth on the scaffolds is similar to that on standard tissue culture plates. MTT assays showed significant penetration and proliferation of cells within the interior of the scaffolds. Alkaline phosphatase, a marker enzyme of bone cell differentiation, was assayed to assess cell function of the scaffolds. Alkaline activity of this marker enzyme increased linearly during the six-day incubation on both scaffolds indicating they both support differentiation. The results obtained suggest that 13-93 sponge and fiber scaffolds are effective frameworks for bone tissue engineering.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know