Reinforcement Learning in Spiking Neural Networks
2022
- 186Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage186
- Abstract Views186
Lecture / Presentation Description
Biological neurons communicate primarily via a spiking process. Recurrently connected spiking neural networks (RSNNs) more realistically model the brain, compared to their non-spiking counterparts. It is of great interest to discover a biologically realistic learning rule to achieve optimal levels of performance on machine learning tasks. Experimental data describe a phenomenon known as spike-timing-dependent-plasticity (STDP), which integrates local firing coincidences between neurons to learn. STDP is believed to underlie memory formation and storage within the brain. When a reward signal modulates STDP, it enables forming associative memories via operant conditioning. Neuromodulators like dopamine operate similarly in the brain. We employ processes like synaptic scaling to support R-STDP in large, unstructured RSNNs. Doing so produces an agent that achieves adequate performance on reinforcement learning tasks.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know