Comparing mental health and well-being of US undergraduate and graduate students during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of American College Health, ISSN: 1940-3208, Vol: 71, Issue: 9, Page: 2775-2785
2023
- 19Citations
- 21Usage
- 123Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef6
- Usage21
- Abstract Views21
- Captures123
- Readers123
- 123
Article Description
Objective: This study explored how COVID-related mental health and well-being varied between undergraduate and graduate students. Relationships with physical health behaviors were also examined. Participants: Undergraduate (n = 897) and graduate (n = 314) students were recruited from three US universities between mid-April and late-May 2020. Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional survey self-reported perceived stress, financial stress, resilience, repetitive negative thinking, mood, anxiety, diet, sleep, and physical activity using validated instruments. Results: Undergraduate students reported more perceived stress, more repetitive negative thinking, less positive mood, and less support from professors than graduate students. Perceived stress, repetitive negative thinking, negative mood, and anxiety increased among all students (p <.05 for all). Correlations between mental health outcomes and physical health behaviors were weak to moderate (r =.08 to.49). Conclusions: College students, particularly undergraduates, perceived negative mental health impacts during COVID. Creative approaches for meeting student needs are necessary.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119435164&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1996372; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34788587; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07448481.2021.1996372; https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/publ_allied_health_pub/22; https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=publ_allied_health_pub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2021.1996372
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know