Nestling immunocompetence is affected by captivity but not investigator handling
Condor, ISSN: 0010-5422, Vol: 109, Issue: 4, Page: 920-928
2007
- 12Citations
- 1Usage
- 31Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
- Mentions4
- News Mentions3
- News3
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
Biological sciences / Mammalian Biology, "Habitat selection of the arboreal marsupial Dromiciopsgliroides and potential effects on the seed dispersal of the mistletoe Tristerixcorymbosus."
Author(s): Agustina Balazote Oliver [sup.1], Laila D. Kazimierski [sup.2], Guillermo C. Amico [sup.3], Juan M. Morales [sup.1] [sup.4] Author Affiliations: (1) https://ror.org/02zvkba47, grid.412234.2, 0000 0001
Article Description
Environmental conditions during the neonatal period can affect the growth, physiology, behavior, and immune function of birds. In many avian studies the nestling environment includes investigator handling of young, which may be stressful. While neonatal handling is known to affect the adult phenotype in rats, the effects of handling on development have rarely been examined in wild birds. We examined the effect of short, repeated periods of neonatal handling on avian growth and immune system development. We subjected American Kestrels (Falco sparverius) and European Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) to 15 min of daily investigator handling throughout the nestling period, while controls remained undisturbed. Immediately prior to fledging we assessed cutaneous immunity, humoral immunity, mass, and degree of fluctuating asymmetry. Daily handling did not significantly affect any of these measurements. We also addressed the possibility that treatment differences would appear only when birds were challenged with a more substantial stressor by bringing birds into captivity for 24 hr. Captivity did not affect mass, but significantly lowered the cutaneous immune response, although this was independent of treatment. Therefore, brief periods of investigator handling did not appear to affect immune or morphological development in these species, whereas 24 hr of captivity resulted in suppressed cutaneous immune responses. © The Cooper Ornithological Society 2007.
Bibliographic Details
http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38349066172&origin=inward; http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&doi=10.1650%2F0010-5422(2007)109%5B920%3ANIIABC%5D2.0.CO%3B2; https://academic.oup.com/condor/article/109/4/920-928/5152088; http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313; http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1312&context=bio_facpubs; http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/bio_facpubs/313; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1312&context=bio_facpubs; http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422%282007%29109
Cooper Ornithological Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know