α-Conotoxin decontamination protocol evaluation: What works and what doesn’t
Toxins, ISSN: 2072-6651, Vol: 9, Issue: 9, Page: 281
2017
- 2Citations
- 282Usage
- 17Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Usage282
- Downloads269
- Abstract Views13
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
- Mentions3
- Blog Mentions3
- Blog3
Most Recent Blog
Toxins, Vol. 9, Pages 281: α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t
Toxins, Vol. 9, Pages 281: α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t Toxins doi: 10.3390/toxins9090281 Authors: Matthew Turner John Cort Owen McDougal Nine
Article Description
Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85029801955&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906461; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/9/281; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/chem_facpubs/112; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1111&context=chem_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090281; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/9/281/pdf; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/9/281/htm; http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/9/281; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/9/281/pdf?version=1505390139; http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/chem_facpubs/112
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know