PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

α-Conotoxin decontamination protocol evaluation: What works and what doesn’t

Toxins, ISSN: 2072-6651, Vol: 9, Issue: 9, Page: 281
2017
  • 2
    Citations
  • 282
    Usage
  • 17
    Captures
  • 3
    Mentions
  • 22
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent Blog

Toxins, Vol. 9, Pages 281: α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t

Toxins, Vol. 9, Pages 281: α-Conotoxin Decontamination Protocol Evaluation: What Works and What Doesn’t Toxins doi: 10.3390/toxins9090281 Authors: Matthew Turner John Cort Owen McDougal Nine

Article Description

Nine publically available biosafety protocols for safely handling conotoxin peptides were tested to evaluate their decontamination efficacy. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (MS) were used to assess the effect of each chemical treatment on the secondary and primary structure of α-CTx MII (L10V, E11A). Of the nine decontamination methods tested, treatment with 1% (m/v) solution of the enzymatic detergent Contrex™ EZ resulted in a 76.8% decrease in α-helical content as assessed by the mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm, and partial peptide digestion was demonstrated using high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Additionally, treatment with 6% sodium hypochlorite (m/v) resulted in 80.5% decrease in α-helical content and complete digestion of the peptide. The Contrex™ EZ treatment was repeated with three additional α-conotoxins (α-CTxs), α-CTxs LvIA, ImI and PeIA, which verified the decontamination method was reasonably robust. These results support the use of either 1% Contrex™ EZ solution or 6% sodium hypochlorite in biosafety protocols for the decontamination of α-CTxs in research laboratories.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know