Privacy-Preserving AI-Based Age Verification Using Low Quality Facial Images
2024
- 86Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage86
- Downloads47
- Abstract Views39
Artifact Description
As younger generations gain easier access to the internet, the need for effective online age verification becomes increasingly critical to ensure age-restricted activities remain accessible only to those who meet legal requirements. Modern online age verification often suffers from either intrusive personal data collection or ineffective blockage. Accurate age verification requires government ID or sensitive information to be exposed, while methods that don’t collect any information from users aren’t suitable for preventing access. This research aims to find an online age verification method that is both accurate and respectful of user privacy using AI and machine learning. The most commonly used metric for AI-based age estimation is facial images, which have proven relatively accurate for determining exact age. This method holds promise for balancing privacy with age gates as it does not require a user's name, address, or other sensitive information—something especially important for minors. To further protect user privacy, we explore age estimation using low-quality facial images, which provide less detail for analysis by both people and computers. If results with low-quality images are shown to retain accuracy, they could pave the way for future age estimation software.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know