Sustainable Weight of Ear-Borne Device for Virtual Fence with Cattle
2024
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
Artifact Description
Virtual fence is a promising tool for adaptive management of livestock grazing. Currently, there are several virtual fence systems using neck-collar devices, similar to the invisible fence used for dogs. Based on rancher input, we are examining if virtual fence technology can be transitioned from neck collars to an ear-borne device. One of the biggest challenges in this transition is identifying a sustainable weight for the devices that allows proper healing of the ear piercing and minimal long-term irritation. Other research with ear-borne devices on cattle has suggested maximum weights anywhere from 30-250 grams. Previous research conducted at the University of Idaho suggests that 60 grams may be a realistic target weight when using two-prong ear tags (EnduroTags). The goal of this proposed research is to examine ear health through 1) the implementation of a healing period; 2) location of weight placement on the ear tag; and 3) the affect of combined weight and electrode configuration. Pre-healed tags only showed minor irritation, mainly crusting, when removed after 2 two weeks. After one week with weighted tags, ear condition appeared similar between those with or without a two-week healing period. Weight placement and probe interaction research is still in progress.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know