Integrating Blockchain with LLMs: Towards a Secure and Safe Technology
2024
- 21Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage21
- Abstract Views21
Artifact Description
Large language models (LLMs) are an emerging technology with the potential to drastically affect how we interact with computing systems. They can produce code, write essays, and be used in agentic capacities. However, various vulnerabilities within these systems have been discovered and current solutions cannot entirely placate the wide array of existing threats. For instance, some vulnerabilities allow the system to respond with misinformation and render the system dysfunctional when attacked. In lieu of these problems, we offer a comprehensive investigation into the rapidly developing field of blockchain for LLMs (BC4LLMs). In particular, we analyze the field concerning blockchain-based security and safety mechanisms. In our survey of BC4LLMs we propose novel definitions for security and safety regarding LLMs and utilize these to further contextualize research efforts. We categorize and elicit prominent areas of interest to those working within this field as well as aim to introduce a common consensus on secure and safe LLMs. Limitations and future research directions are discussed; special emphasis is placed on blockchain’s beneficial integration with this potentially disruptive technology.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know