Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Reframed Through the ISTE Standards: An Investigation Among Urban K-12 Teachers
2020
- 2,203Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,203
- Downloads1,657
- 1,657
- Abstract Views546
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Utilizing a descriptive research design and a theoretical framework based on self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997), this quantitative study examined self-efficacy as a factor on teachers’ technology use and integration efforts in urban K-12 classroom settings of 327 Catholic school teachers in Southern California. To measure teachers’ self-efficacy in using and integrating technology in the classroom, this study employed an online survey that included the Technology Integration Confidence Scale (TICS) version 3, an instrument developed by the researcher which is aligned to the ISTE (2017) Standards for Educators, and seven key demographic questions. Chief among these is the frequency of technology-oriented professional development (PD) training sessions teachers received.This study’s findings revealed that, on average, participating teachers had a fair level of confidence (i.e., they are fairly but not highly confident) in both using and integrating technology (M = 3.2, SD = .73). Furthermore, the research analysis confirmed that participating teachers’ self-efficacy was a crucial factor in effectively using and integrating technology in their teaching practice based on the ISTE (2017) Standards for Educators. Accordingly, the current study established participating teachers’ level of confidence in using and applying technology through continuous PD intervention as a key implication that influenced teachers’ self-efficacy in leveraging technology for professional practice. Limitations and applicability of future studies are also addressed.
Bibliographic Details
http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/1692/; http://dx.doi.org/10.18122/td/1692/boisestate; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/1692; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2825&context=td; https://dx.doi.org/10.18122/td/1692/boisestate; https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/td/1692/
Boise State University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know