Understanding Connections Between Public Health Districts and Individuals Who Have Recently Been Released from Carceral Systems in Idaho
2023
- 71Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage71
- Downloads59
- Abstract Views12
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Thesis / Dissertation Description
BackgroundGaining a better understanding of the relationship between public health and individuals recently released from the carceral system in Idaho is vital. According to the Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2020 Idaho had the highest female incarceration rate of all US states at twice the national average (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2020). The incarceration rate of women and girls has increased nearly 834% in the last 40 years and rates in Idaho follow this trend (Steinberg, 2018). Compared to 62% of women in prisons nationally, 80% of women in local jails report having children under the age of 18 (Glaze and Maruschak, 2016). Idaho has additional cause for concern, as the state has the highest incarceration rate of both non-violent offenders and drug offenders (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2020).The focus of this work is with individuals who are recently released. With 95% of incarcerated populations projected to be released and 5% currently serving life sentences (Hughes and Wilson, 2003), public health interventions focused on this population are extremely important. Idaho released 4,001 individuals from prison in 2020; this number does not include the re-entry rates for city or county jails (Carson and Cowhig, 2020). These statistics are one aspect of why public health efforts are essential to aid in the transition from incarceration to free living.This project is in alignment with the core mission of those working in public health to improve health in communities served. Additionally, the Idaho Public Health Districts (PHD) have goals of evaluating the programs and interventions for underserved populations. Many of the PHDs in Idaho are working towards public health accreditation with the Public Health Accreditation Board. As a part of this process, the PHDs continue to make efforts towards more equitable health outcomes in our communities.A necessary part of this process is to uplift outcomes for recently released populations–populations who are highly at risk for disparate outcomes involving epidemiology, mental health, substance abuse among others (Prina, 2022). Many individuals in this population are at risk upon release and face challenges including access to identification, housing, employment, healthcare, among other necessities. The purpose of this project is to establish connections between the public health districts and recently released populations.AimThe purpose of this study is to explore the connections between the public health districts and individuals recently released from carceral systems in Idaho. Prior to this study, little was known about the programs and support available to this population from the PHDs. Key-informant interviews were conducted with employees from the seven public health districts and used to describe the existing landscape, barriers, and opportunities. The goal of this project was to document existing connections and use this information as a foundational benchmark for future enhancements to aid in the health and wellbeing of individuals recently released from carceral systems in Idaho.MethodsUsing Grounded Theory, we documented existing connections and used this information as a foundation for enhancing the health and wellbeing of individuals recently released from carceral systems in Idaho. The seven public health district directors in Idaho identified one or more staff members to participate in one 45-60 minute web-based interview. All interviews were conducted via Zoom. The interview protocol was approved by the Boise State University Institutional Review Board under IRB #186-SB22-139. Questions were developed by the researcher and reviewed and piloted with members of the thesis committee. The interview questions were designed to gather information about public health resources, programs, outreach strategies, future opportunities, and efforts to serve individuals disproportionately impacted by carceral systems.ResultsMost respondents (6/7) stated that public health played a significant role in helping individuals transition from the carceral setting to the community. The same number of respondents stated that it is highly important for public health to be involved in these transitions, rating the importance at least an 8 out of 10. Additionally, the same number stated that public health provided many programs, however few specifically targeted this priority population. All reported that the current efforts in place were fairly to highly successful, however many stated that the PHDs had limited ways to measure the success of prospective programs. In regards to needed partnerships, (3/7) stated that there was a need to expand current partnerships. Some respondents (2/7) stated there was a need to expand partnerships for housing efforts. Many (5/7) respondents stated that outreach efforts for this priority population were non-existent in their PHD. None of the respondents stated that the current outreach efforts were adequate with more outreach efforts needed. In regards to networking efforts, almost all (6/7) respondents described their current Board of Health as not being opposed to efforts to reach recently released populations, especially the benefits of such programs.ConclusionThese key-informant interviews are vital to helping us describe the existing landscape, barriers, and opportunities of re-entry programs in Idaho. The current connections between public health and individuals recently released from carceral systems in Idaho is present but weak. There is much room for improvement in efforts to assist this highly vulnerable population including expansion and streamlining of services, additional outreach efforts, establishing measures of success, and continued networking with Boards of Health and community partners.
Bibliographic Details
Boise State University, Albertsons Library
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know