The Ghettoization of Humanities Degrees
2018
- 36Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage36
- Abstract Views36
Lecture / Presentation Description
Higher education has been marketed as the ultimate equalizer, the foundation in which culture, class, and gender are neutral and every person has the right to equal access of educational opportunities. However, long standing segregation has maintained a status quo of matriarchal-dominated career paths. The shift from cultural knowledge to technical-based skill has transformed the environment of higher education into a business; necessitating that students perform the roles of consumer and product, with the highest prestige and value placed on STEM graduates. In this paper, I argue that neoliberal ideologies have prioritized masculine-dominated STEM fields, creating negative views towards feminized humanities degree and opposition for equalizing gender equality through marketing or scholarship methods in order to protect the continuation of sexism and male privilege in higher education.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know