Understanding Open Access Data Using Visualizations in R
2018
- 261Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage261
- Downloads147
- Abstract Views114
Artifact Description
BACKGROUND: As access to open data is increasing, researchers gain the opportunity to build integrated data sets and to conduct more powerful statistical analyses. However, using open access data presents challenges for researchers in understanding the data. Visualizations allow researchers to address these challenges by facilitating a greater understanding of the information available.AIMS: This paper illustrates how visuals can address the challenges that researchers face when using open access data, such as: (1) becoming familiar with the data, (2) identifying patterns and trends within the data, and (3) determining how to integrate data from multiple studies.DATA: This paper uses data from an integrative data analysis study that combines data from four prospective studies of children’s responses to natural disasters including Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Charley, Hurricane Katrina, and Hurricane Ike. The integrated dataset assessed posttraumatic stress symptoms, hurricane exposure, anxiety, life events, and social support among 1707 participants (53.61% female). The children’s ages ranged from 7 to 16 years (mean = 9.61, SD = 1.60).CONCLUSIONS: Visualizations serve as an effective method of understanding new and unfamiliar data sets. In response to the growth of open access data, researchers must develop the skills necessary to create informative visuals. Most research-based graduate programs do not require programming-based courses for graduation. More opportunities for training in programming languages need to be offered so that future researchers are better prepared to understand new data. This paper discusses implications of current graduate course requirements and standard journal practices on how researchers visualize data.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know